Comparative assessment of SNP genotyping assays for challenging forensic samples utilizing ancient DNA methods.
JSON
Staadig A, Krzewińska M, Sidstedt M, Kling D, Fagerholm SA, Ansell R, Götherström A, Tillmar A
Genome Biol. 26 (1) 433 [2025-12-23; online 2025-12-23]
The fields of ancient DNA research and forensic genetics share both methodological similarities and common challenges, particularly in the analysis of degraded DNA. Leveraging these overlaps, this study evaluates three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)-based genotyping assays for analyzing challenging forensic samples: the FORCE-QIAseq SNP panel, the Twist ancient DNA hybridization capture panel, and whole-genome sequencing. We analyze twenty skeletal bone and tooth samples from authentic missing person cases, where almost all samples are severely degraded and contain exceptionally low amounts of endogenous DNA, reflected by both reduced quantifiable DNA concentrations and lower proportions of human DNA reads than typically obtained from high-quality forensic samples. Despite these challenging sample characteristics, both the FORCE and Twist assays successfully generate a substantial number of genotypes across many samples, while whole-genome sequencing yields fewer SNP calls. However, techniques like probabilistic genotyping, increase sequencing depth or genotype imputation can further enhance the utility of WGS for forensic use. This study highlights the effectiveness of incorporating ancient DNA methods into forensic genetics for the analysis of degraded samples. The findings are broadly applicable to both forensic and ancient DNA research disciplines, offering valuable insights into assay selection based on sample condition and investigative goals.
NGI Stockholm (Genomics Production) [Service]
National Genomics Infrastructure [Service]
PubMed 41430704
DOI 10.1186/s13059-025-03912-z
Crossref 10.1186/s13059-025-03912-z
pmc: PMC12723910
pii: 10.1186/s13059-025-03912-z